[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YcRif3u3GxUdP3il@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 03:50:23 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: "Alex Xu (Hello71)" <alex_y_xu@...oo.ca>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
ming.lei@...hat.com, hch@....de, Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>,
"Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: very low IOPS due to "block: reduce
kblockd_mod_delayed_work_on() CPU consumption"
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 08:28:18AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > Dexuan, can you test this for your test case too? I'm going to queue
> > up a revert for -rc6 just in case.
>
> This one should be better...
We might just want something like a revert of
9f993737906b30d7b2454a38637d1f70ffd60f2f.
Or just always use a normal work queue for run_work, and then use a
timer to schedule it for the relatively rare delayed case.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists