[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211223123011.41044-10-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 20:30:04 +0800
From: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
qemu-devel@...gnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
luto@...nel.org, john.ji@...el.com, susie.li@...el.com,
jun.nakajima@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
david@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 kvm/queue 09/16] KVM: Split out common memory invalidation code
When fd-based memory is enabled, there will be two types of memory
invalidation:
- memory invalidation from native MMU through mmu_notifier callback
for hva-based memory, and,
- memory invalidation from memfd through memfd_notifier callback for
fd-based memory.
Some code can be shared between these two types of memory invalidation.
This patch moves those shared code into one place so that it can be
used for both CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER and CONFIG_MEMFD_NOTIFIER.
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
---
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 19736a0013a0..7b7530b1ea1e 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -469,22 +469,6 @@ void kvm_destroy_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_destroy_vcpus);
#if defined(CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER) && defined(KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER)
-static inline struct kvm *mmu_notifier_to_kvm(struct mmu_notifier *mn)
-{
- return container_of(mn, struct kvm, mmu_notifier);
-}
-
-static void kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
- struct mm_struct *mm,
- unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
-{
- struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
- int idx;
-
- idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
- kvm_arch_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(kvm, start, end);
- srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
-}
typedef bool (*gfn_handler_t)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
@@ -611,6 +595,25 @@ static __always_inline int __kvm_handle_useraddr_range(struct kvm *kvm,
/* The notifiers are averse to booleans. :-( */
return (int)ret;
}
+#endif
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER) && defined(KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER)
+static inline struct kvm *mmu_notifier_to_kvm(struct mmu_notifier *mn)
+{
+ return container_of(mn, struct kvm, mmu_notifier);
+}
+
+static void kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
+ struct mm_struct *mm,
+ unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+{
+ struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
+ int idx;
+
+ idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
+ kvm_arch_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(kvm, start, end);
+ srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+}
static __always_inline int kvm_handle_hva_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
unsigned long start,
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists