[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211223132733.1400381-1-jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 21:27:33 +0800
From: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
To: robin.murphy@....com, andy.shevchenko@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
liviu.dudau@....com, sudeep.holla@....com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v3] serial: mps2-uart: Check for error irq
On 2021-12-23 12:54, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> Because of the possible failure of the platform_get_irq(), it should be
>> better to check it to avoid the use of error irq.
>
> As far as I can see, the only "use" of error values is that they will be
> passed to request_irq(), which will then return -EINVAL because they are
> not valid IRQ numbers, and that error will be handled appropriately. I
> think that's a relatively common pattern, so your commit message should
> really describe why you think it's a problem and why this addition is a
> meaningful improvement.
Thanks for your reminder, and I correct my commit message as follow.
If that's ok, I will correct my other patches like this.
For the possible failure of the platform_get_irq(), the returned irq
could be error number and will finally cause the failure of the request_irq().
So it might be better to check just now in order to avoid the waste of
later processes.
Sincerely thanks,
Jiasheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists