[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211223133228.7zy63enji7jkwuwc@enquirer>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 07:32:28 -0600
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
CC: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<SantoshShilimkarssantosh@...nel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: smartreflex: Use platform_get_irq_optional() to
get the interrupt
On 19:28-20211221, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
[...]
> Yes, the probe will fail silently in case of error while getting an
> interrupt if it exists in DT. Do you want me to add an error message
> in case of an error? I'll be sending v2 anyway dropping the check for
> IRQ0.
Yes please, please add an error message.
[...]
> rc should be OK, as there will be tree wide changes.
Lets try and do that (hopefully we should have a new respin by rc1).
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D)/Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists