linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] ext4: Fix remount with 'abort' option isn't effective

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:41:50 -0500
From:   "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     yebin <yebin10@...wei.com>
Cc:     Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ext4: Fix remount with 'abort' option isn't
 effective

On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 09:41:31AM +0800, yebin wrote:
> 
> On 2021/12/22 17:19, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:06:22AM +0800, yebin wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 2021/12/21 22:43, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > nice catch. This is a bug indeed. However I am currently in a process of
> > > > changing the ctx_set/clear/test_ helpers because currently it generates
> > > > functions that are unused.
> > > > 
> > > > While I am at it I can just create a custom ctx_set_mount_flags()
> > > > helper that would behave as expected so that we won't have to specify
> > > > "1 < EXT4_MF_FS_ABORTED" which is not really obvious and hence error
> > > > prone.
> > > Actually, I fixed the first version as follows:
> > Allright, this looks better.

Was there an update to this patch?  I can't seem to find it in my
inbox or in patchwork....

Thanks,

					- Ted