[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whmsosJkXoN+arC6eUdayq42pTZzr1j0rG3=RsPBgqujA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 09:20:26 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: Generalize pf_io_worker so it can point to
struct kthread
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 9:19 PM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
> Instead of continuing to use the set_child_tid field of task_struct
> generalize the pf_io_worker field of task_struct and use it to hold
> the kthread pointer.
Well that patch certainly looks like a nice cleanup to me. Thanks.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists