Message-Id: <20211223173316.779982-1-wizhao@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:33:16 -0500
From:   William Zhao <wizhao@...hat.com>
To:     steffen.klassert@...unet.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
        davem@...emloft.net, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, dsahern@...nel.org,
        kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wizhao@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH] ip6_vti: initialize __ip6_tnl_parm struct in vti6_siocdevprivate

The "__ip6_tnl_parm" struct was left uninitialized causing an invalid
load of random data when the "__ip6_tnl_parm" struct was used elsewhere.
As an example, in the function "ip6_tnl_xmit_ctl()", it tries to access
the "collect_md" member. With "__ip6_tnl_parm" being uninitialized and
containing random data, the UBSAN detected that "collect_md" held a
non-boolean value.

The UBSAN issue is as follows:
===============================================================
UBSAN: invalid-load in net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c:1025:14
load of value 30 is not a valid value for type '_Bool'
CPU: 1 PID: 228 Comm: kworker/1:3 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc4+ #8
Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011
Workqueue: ipv6_addrconf addrconf_dad_work
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x57
ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x40
__ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value+0x66/0x70
? __cpuhp_setup_state+0x1d3/0x210
ip6_tnl_xmit_ctl.cold.52+0x2c/0x6f [ip6_tunnel]
vti6_tnl_xmit+0x79c/0x1e96 [ip6_vti]
? lock_is_held_type+0xd9/0x130
? vti6_rcv+0x100/0x100 [ip6_vti]
? lock_is_held_type+0xd9/0x130
? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xc0/0xc0
? lock_acquired+0x262/0xb10
dev_hard_start_xmit+0x1e6/0x820
__dev_queue_xmit+0x2079/0x3340
? mark_lock.part.52+0xf7/0x1050
? netdev_core_pick_tx+0x290/0x290
? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30
? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0x10
? sched_clock_cpu+0x15/0x200
? find_held_lock+0x3a/0x1c0
? lock_release+0x42f/0xc90
? lock_downgrade+0x6b0/0x6b0
? mark_held_locks+0xb7/0x120
? neigh_connected_output+0x31f/0x470
? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x79/0x100
? neigh_connected_output+0x31f/0x470
? ip6_finish_output2+0x9b0/0x1d90
? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0x62/0xc0
? ip6_finish_output2+0x9b0/0x1d90
ip6_finish_output2+0x9b0/0x1d90
? ip6_append_data+0x330/0x330
? ip6_mtu+0x166/0x370
? __ip6_finish_output+0x1ad/0xfb0
? nf_hook_slow+0xa6/0x170
ip6_output+0x1fb/0x710
? nf_hook.constprop.32+0x317/0x430
? ip6_finish_output+0x180/0x180
? __ip6_finish_output+0xfb0/0xfb0
? lock_is_held_type+0xd9/0x130
ndisc_send_skb+0xb33/0x1590
? __sk_mem_raise_allocated+0x11cf/0x1560
? dst_output+0x4a0/0x4a0
? ndisc_send_rs+0x432/0x610
addrconf_dad_completed+0x30c/0xbb0
? addrconf_rs_timer+0x650/0x650
? addrconf_dad_work+0x73c/0x10e0
addrconf_dad_work+0x73c/0x10e0
? addrconf_dad_completed+0xbb0/0xbb0
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xaf/0xe0
? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xc0/0xc0
process_one_work+0x97b/0x1740
? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x270/0x270
worker_thread+0x87/0xbf0
? process_one_work+0x1740/0x1740
kthread+0x3ac/0x490
? set_kthread_struct+0x100/0x100
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
</TASK>
===============================================================

The solution is to initialize "__ip6_tnl_parm" struct to zeros in the
"vti6_siocdevprivate()" function.

Signed-off-by: William Zhao <wizhao@...hat.com>
---
 net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c
index 527e9ead7449..5e9474bc54fc 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c
@@ -808,6 +808,8 @@ vti6_siocdevprivate(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *ifr, void __user *data
 	struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
 	struct vti6_net *ip6n = net_generic(net, vti6_net_id);
 
+	memset(&p1, 0, sizeof(p1));
+
 	switch (cmd) {
 	case SIOCGETTUNNEL:
 		if (dev == ip6n->fb_tnl_dev) {

base-commit: b8a98b6bf66ae35361e987333233d07241642909
-- 
2.27.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists