[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YcTVb4thNW4RmEHn@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 15:00:47 -0500
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] notifier: Return an error when a callback has
already been registered
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 04:31:01PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>
> Return -EEXIST when a notifier callback has already been registered on a
> notifier chain.
>
> This should avoid any homegrown registration tracking at the callsite
> like
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/amd-gfx/20210512013058.6827-1-mukul.joshi@amd.com
>
> for example.
>
> This version is an alternative of
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211108101157.15189-1-bp@alien8.de
>
> which needed to touch every caller not checking the registration
> routine's return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> ---
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> kernel/notifier.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/notifier.c b/kernel/notifier.c
> index b8251dc0bc0f..ba005ebf4730 100644
> --- a/kernel/notifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/notifier.c
> @@ -20,12 +20,13 @@ BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(reboot_notifier_list);
> */
>
> static int notifier_chain_register(struct notifier_block **nl,
> - struct notifier_block *n)
> + struct notifier_block *n)
> {
> while ((*nl) != NULL) {
> if (unlikely((*nl) == n)) {
> - WARN(1, "double register detected");
> - return 0;
> + WARN(1, "notifier callback %ps already registered",
> + n->notifier_call);
> + return -EEXIST;
> }
> if (n->priority > (*nl)->priority)
> break;
> @@ -134,7 +135,7 @@ static int notifier_call_chain_robust(struct notifier_block **nl,
> *
> * Adds a notifier to an atomic notifier chain.
> *
> - * Currently always returns zero.
> + * Returns 0 on success, %-EEXIST on error.
> */
> int atomic_notifier_chain_register(struct atomic_notifier_head *nh,
> struct notifier_block *n)
> @@ -216,7 +217,7 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(atomic_notifier_call_chain);
> * Adds a notifier to a blocking notifier chain.
> * Must be called in process context.
> *
> - * Currently always returns zero.
> + * Returns 0 on success, %-EEXIST on error.
> */
> int blocking_notifier_chain_register(struct blocking_notifier_head *nh,
> struct notifier_block *n)
> @@ -335,7 +336,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blocking_notifier_call_chain);
> * Adds a notifier to a raw notifier chain.
> * All locking must be provided by the caller.
> *
> - * Currently always returns zero.
> + * Returns 0 on success, %-EEXIST on error.
> */
> int raw_notifier_chain_register(struct raw_notifier_head *nh,
> struct notifier_block *n)
> @@ -406,7 +407,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(raw_notifier_call_chain);
> * Adds a notifier to an SRCU notifier chain.
> * Must be called in process context.
> *
> - * Currently always returns zero.
> + * Returns 0 on success, %-EEXIST on error.
> */
> int srcu_notifier_chain_register(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh,
> struct notifier_block *n)
> --
> 2.29.2
>
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists