[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <02c71d9fe95f72c5aa5a01adadda8fb7e756fae1.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:13:10 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>
Cc: Krzysztof HaĆasa <khalasa@...p.pl>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] Driver for ON Semi AR0521 camera sensor
On Thu, 2021-12-23 at 19:48 +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> The media subsystem requires to validate patches with
>
> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict --max-line-length=80
>
> We longly debated this and I believe it's now generally accepted to go
> over 80 when it makes sense, but not regularly span to 120 cols like
> in the previous version.
Where is this documented and do you have a link to the debate?
The archive for the i2c mailing list doesn't show much debate:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/?q=%2280+columns%22
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/?q=%22line+length%22
Perhaps there should be a MAINTAINERS P: entry for this requirement.
>From MAINTAINERS:
P: Subsystem Profile document for more details submitting
patches to the given subsystem. This is either an in-tree file,
or a URI. See Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
for details.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists