linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] drm/vkms: add support for multiple overlay planes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211223203525.4sr7rjfq6l42il5r@mail.igalia.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Dec 2021 19:35:48 -0100
From:   Melissa Wen <mwen@...lia.com>
To:     José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>
Cc:     rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com, hamohammed.sa@...il.com,
        airlied@...ux.ie, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, melissa.srw@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] drm/vkms: add support for multiple overlay planes

On 12/13, José Expósito wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> First of all, let me quickly introduce myself. I'm José Expósito and
> I'm a hobbyist open source developer.
> My contributions are usually in the kernel input/HID subsystems and
> in its userspace library (libinput) as well as other projects.
> 
> I'm trying to learn more about the GPU and I found VKMS as a good
> project to get started.
> 
> So, now that you have been warned about my (lack) of experience in this
> subsystem, let's get into the patches.
> 
> The series adds support for multiple overlay planes by adding a new
> module parameter that allows to configure the number of overlay planes
> to add.
> 
> I checked that the planes are properly created using drm_info[1] and
> also executed the IGT test "kms_plane" to make sure that the planes
> were listed in the output.
> In addition, I checked the vkms_composer and -even though I'm not sure
> how to properly test it- it looks like it is already prepared to
> compose an arbitrary number of planes.
> Having said that, I really hope I didn't make any obvious mistakes.
> 
> I noticed that the docs say:
> > For all of these, we also want to review the igt test coverage and
> > make sure all relevant igt testcases work on vkms
> 
> I ran some plane related tests, but some of them were already failing
> without my code, so I'd appreciate some help with this bit.

Hi José,

What test did you run? Indeed, not all kms tests are passing and fixes
are welcome :)

Last time, I used these testcases for overlay: kms_plane_cursor,
kms_atomic; and these tests were fine too: kms_cursor_crc, kms_writeback,
kms_flip

Did you find any regression? Also, a good practice is to report in the
commit message which IGT tests you used to check the proposed changes.

Btw, thanks for your patchset.

Melissa

> 
> Thank you very much in advance for your time. Any suggestions to
> improve this patchset or about what to work on next are very welcome.
> 
> Jose
> 
> [1] https://github.com/ascent12/drm_info
> 
> José Expósito (3):
>   drm/vkms: refactor overlay plane creation
>   drm/vkms: add support for multiple overlay planes
>   drm/vkms: drop "Multiple overlay planes" TODO
> 
>  Documentation/gpu/vkms.rst         |  2 --
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.c    |  5 +++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h    |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_output.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)