lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <509065063.197038.1640293568550.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date:   Thu, 23 Dec 2021 22:06:08 +0100 (CET)
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     "libaokun (A)" <libaokun1@...wei.com>
Cc:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, yukuai3@...wei.com,
        Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next V3] ubi: fix race condition between
 ctrl_cdev_ioctl and ubi_cdev_ioctl

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "libaokun (A)" <libaokun1@...wei.com>
> 在 2021/11/5 17:30, Baokun Li 写道:
> 
> ping

Thanks for your patience.
 
>> Hulk Robot reported a KASAN report about use-after-free:

[...]

>> The cause of this problem is that commit 714fb87e8bc0 make device
>> "available" before it becomes accessible via sysfs. Therefore, we
>> roll back the modification. We will fix the race condition between
>> ubi device creation and udev by removing ubi_get_device in
>> vol_attribute_show and dev_attribute_show.This avoids accessing
>> uninitialized ubi_devices[ubi_num].
>>
>> ubi_get_device is used to prevent devices from being deleted during
>> sysfs execution. However, now kernfs ensures that devices will not
>> be deleted before all reference counting are released.
>> The key process is shown in the following stack.

ubi_get_device() in dev_attribute_show() is used to detect whether
the ubi device got detached while the sysfs file is open.

Hmm. I thought for sysfs this is not the case since sysfs does not implement
a release() method. So kernfs_drain_open_files() will return early.
But there is a good chance that I don't got all kernfs/sysfs details.

Thanks,
//richard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ