lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 24 Dec 2021 10:07:22 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@...com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the phy-next tree

On 24-12-21, 14:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the phy-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c: In function 'can_transceiver_phy_power_on':
> drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c:35:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'mux_state_select'; did you mean 'mux_control_select'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    35 |   ret = mux_state_select(can_transceiver_phy->mux_state);
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |         mux_control_select
> drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c: In function 'can_transceiver_phy_power_off':
> drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c:59:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'mux_state_deselect'; did you mean 'mux_control_deselect'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    59 |   mux_state_deselect(can_transceiver_phy->mux_state);
>       |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |   mux_control_deselect
> drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c: In function 'can_transceiver_phy_probe':
> drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c:113:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'devm_mux_state_get'; did you mean 'devm_mux_control_get'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   113 |   mux_state = devm_mux_state_get(dev, NULL);
>       |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |               devm_mux_control_get
> drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c:113:13: error: assignment to 'struct mux_state *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
>   113 |   mux_state = devm_mux_state_get(dev, NULL);
>       |             ^
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   1e68cd3ff73e ("phy: phy-can-transceiver: Add support for setting mux")
> 
> I have used the phy-next tree from next-20211223 for today.

Thanks for letting me know. I have dropped the offending commit


-- 
~Vinod

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ