linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] perf test: Make metric testing more robust.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e078ac0f-6165-9670-926f-d1f2c536ea9e@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Dec 2021 08:49:35 +0000
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        "Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf test: Make metric testing more robust.

On 23/12/2021 18:56, Ian Rogers wrote:
> When testing metric expressions we fake counter values from 1 going
> upward. For some metrics this can yield negative values that are clipped
> to zero, and then cause divide by zero failures. Such clipping is
> questionable but may be a result of tools automatically generating
> metrics. A workaround for this case is to try a second time with counter
> values going in the opposite direction.
> 
> This case was seen in a metric like:
>    event1 / max(event2 - event3, 0)
> But it may also happen in more sensible metrics like:
>    event1 / (event2 + event3 - 1 - event4)
> 
> v2. Rebase and more detail in commit message.
> v3. Is a rebase.

Incorrect location for this info

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>

> ---
>   tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>   1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c b/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c
> index df1c9a3cc05b..b2ddf928d32a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c
> @@ -962,8 +962,18 @@ static int test__parsing(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
>   			}
>   
>   			if (expr__parse(&result, ctx, pe->metric_expr)) {
> -				expr_failure("Parse failed", map, pe);
> -				ret++;
> +				/*
> +				 * Parsing failed, make numbers go from large to
> +				 * small which can resolve divide by zero

can or may?

> +				 * issues.
> +				 */
> +				k = 1024;
> +				hashmap__for_each_entry(ctx->ids, cur, bkt)
> +					expr__add_id_val(ctx, strdup(cur->key), k--);
> +				if (expr__parse(&result, ctx, pe->metric_expr)) {
> +					expr_failure("Parse failed", map, pe);
> +					ret++;
> +				}
>   			}
>   		}
>   	}
> @@ -1022,10 +1032,20 @@ static int metric_parse_fake(const char *str)
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	if (expr__parse(&result, ctx, str))
> -		pr_err("expr__parse failed\n");
> -	else
> -		ret = 0;
> +	ret = 0;
> +	if (expr__parse(&result, ctx, str)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Parsing failed, make numbers go from large to small which can
> +		 * resolve divide by zero issues.
> +		 */
> +		i = 1024;
> +		hashmap__for_each_entry(ctx->ids, cur, bkt)
> +			expr__add_id_val(ctx, strdup(cur->key), i--);
> +		if (expr__parse(&result, ctx, str)) {
> +			pr_err("expr__parse failed\n");
> +			ret = -1;
> +		}
> +	}
>   
>   out:
>   	expr__ctx_free(ctx);
>