[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <796577bb0052f4f08f58882dfc86734d72f2aa29.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 06:02:19 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: andrey.konovalov@...ux.dev, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: raw-gadget: upgrade license identifier
On Sun, 2021-12-26 at 14:19 +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> I wonder if checkpatch could alert about considering GPL-2.0+ when
> adding new files.
No. Licensing is up to the author/submitter.
One nit checkpatch could warn about is the use of MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2")
rather than MODULE_LICENSE("GPL") as that's an unnecessary distinction.
See: https://lore.kernel.org/all/alpine.DEB.2.21.1901282105450.1669@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/
Given there are a several thousand existing uses of "GPL v2" in the
kernel, do this check only for new patches and not existing files.
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index b01c36a15d9dd..5b00f1f491aff 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -7418,6 +7418,10 @@ sub process {
WARN("MODULE_LICENSE",
"unknown module license " . $extracted_string . "\n" . $herecurr);
}
+ if (!$file && $extracted_string eq '"GPL v2"') {
+ WARN("MODULE_LICENSE",
+ "Prefer \"GPL\" over \"GPL v2\" - see: https://lore.kernel.org/all/alpine.DEB.2.21.1901282105450.1669\@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/\n" . $herecurr);
+ }
}
# check for sysctl duplicate constants
Powered by blists - more mailing lists