lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YckgOocIWOrOoRvf@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 27 Dec 2021 02:08:58 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Cc:     viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        hch@...radead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] fs: super: possible ABBA deadlocks in
 do_thaw_all_callback() and freeze_bdev()

On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 10:03:35AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> My static analysis tool reports several possible ABBA deadlocks in Linux
> 5.10:
> 
> do_thaw_all_callback()
>   down_write(&sb->s_umount); --> Line 1028 (Lock A)
>   emergency_thaw_bdev()
>     thaw_bdev()
>       mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_fsfreeze_mutex); --> Line 602 (Lock B)
> 
> freeze_bdev()
>   mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_fsfreeze_mutex); --> Line 556 (Lock B)
>   freeze_super()
>     down_write(&sb->s_umount); --> Line 1716 (Lock A)
>     down_write(&sb->s_umount); --> Line 1738 (Lock A)
>   deactivate_super()
>     down_write(&s->s_umount); --> Line 365 (Lock A)
> 
> When do_thaw_all_callback() and freeze_bdev() are concurrently executed, the
> deadlocks can occur.
> 
> I am not quite sure whether these possible deadlocks are real and how to fix
> them if them are real.
> Any feedback would be appreciated, thanks :)

As a rule, ABBA deadlocks that can actually occur are already found by
lockdep.    Tools that think they've found something are generally wrong.
I'm not inclined to look in detail to find out why this tool is wrong
because lockdep is so effective.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ