linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] erofs: tidy up z_erofs_lz4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YckjO1lSbaB6Ixze@B-P7TQMD6M-0146.local>
Date:   Mon, 27 Dec 2021 10:21:47 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yue Hu <huyue2@...ong.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] erofs: tidy up z_erofs_lz4_decompress

Hi Chao,

On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 10:08:54AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2021/12/25 15:06, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > To prepare for the upcoming ztailpacking feature and further
> > cleanups, introduce a unique z_erofs_lz4_decompress_ctx to keep
> > the context, including inpages, outpages and oend, which are
> > frequently used by the lz4 decompressor.
> > 
> > No logic changes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> >   fs/erofs/decompressor.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> >   1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/erofs/decompressor.c b/fs/erofs/decompressor.c
> > index c373a199c407..d1282a8b709e 100644
> > --- a/fs/erofs/decompressor.c
> > +++ b/fs/erofs/decompressor.c
> > @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@
> >   #define LZ4_DECOMPRESS_INPLACE_MARGIN(srcsize)  (((srcsize) >> 8) + 32)
> >   #endif
> > +struct z_erofs_lz4_decompress_ctx {
> > +	struct z_erofs_decompress_req *rq;
> > +	unsigned int inpages, outpages, oend;
> > +};
> > +
> 
> Could you please comment a bit about fields of structure
> z_erofs_lz4_decompress_ctx?
> 

Many thanks for the comment! I will revise it in the next version.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> Otherwise, the patch looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
> 
> Thanks,