[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a2c6cb9-abe7-ab32-b11c-d78621361555@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:45:45 +0300
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>
Cc: kernel@...nvz.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] nfs4: handle async processing of F_SETLK with FL_SLEEP
nfsd and lockd use F_SETLK cmd with the FL_SLEEP flag set to request
asynchronous processing of blocking locks.
Currently nfs4 use locks_lock_inode_wait() function blocked on such requests.
To handle such requests properly, non-blocking posix_file_lock()
function should be used instead.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215383
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
---
VvS: I'm not sure that request->fl_file points to the same state->inode
used in locks_lock_inode_wait(). If it is not, posix_lock_inode() can be
used here, but this function is static currently and should be exported first.
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index ee3bc79f6ca3..54431b296c85 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -7200,8 +7200,11 @@ static int _nfs4_proc_setlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock
int status;
request->fl_flags |= FL_ACCESS;
- status = locks_lock_inode_wait(state->inode, request);
- if (status < 0)
+ if ((request->fl_flags && FL_SLEEP) && IS_SETLK(cmd))
+ status = posix_lock_file(request->fl_file, request, NULL);
+ else
+ status = locks_lock_inode_wait(state->inode, request);
+ if (status)
goto out;
mutex_lock(&sp->so_delegreturn_mutex);
down_read(&nfsi->rwsem);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists