linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: lan966x: Fix the vlan used by host ports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Dec 2021 12:20:10 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        vivien.didelot@...il.com, vladimir.oltean@....com, andrew@...n.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: lan966x: Fix the vlan used by host ports

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:

On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 15:01:13 +0100 you wrote:
> The blamed commit changed the vlan used by the host ports to be 4095
> instead of 0.
> Because of this change the following issues are seen:
> - when the port is probed first it was adding an entry in the MAC table
>   with the wrong vlan (port->pvid which is default 0) and not HOST_PVID
> - when the port is removed from a bridge, it was using the wrong vlan to
>   add entries in the MAC table. It was using the old PVID and not the
>   HOST_PVID
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] net: lan966x: Fix the vlan used by host ports
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/0c94d657d2a4

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html