[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <162c710f-4fa2-1cb4-e332-83e33e510e42@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 17:02:39 +0200
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Felipe Balbi (Intel)" <balbi@...nel.org>,
Raymond Tan <raymond.tan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/23] counter: intel-qep: Convert to new counter
registration
On 12/27/21 11:45, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> This fixes device lifetime issues where it was possible to free a live
> struct device.
>
> Fixes: b711f687a1c1 ("counter: Add support for Intel Quadrature Encoder Peripheral")
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/counter/intel-qep.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
Should the Fixes tag rather be b6c50affda59 ("counter: Add character
device interface") instead of when each drivers were introduced? I mean
was it possible to hit the issue before /dev/counter was introduced?
Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists