linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 20/76] igb: fix deadlock caused by taking RTNL in RPM resume path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211227151325.386917209@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 27 Dec 2021 16:30:35 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Martin Stolpe <martin.stolpe@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 20/76] igb: fix deadlock caused by taking RTNL in RPM resume path

From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit ac8c58f5b535d6272324e2b8b4a0454781c9147e ]

Recent net core changes caused an issue with few Intel drivers
(reportedly igb), where taking RTNL in RPM resume path results in a
deadlock. See [0] for a bug report. I don't think the core changes
are wrong, but taking RTNL in RPM resume path isn't needed.
The Intel drivers are the only ones doing this. See [1] for a
discussion on the issue. Following patch changes the RPM resume path
to not take RTNL.

[0] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215129
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20211125074949.5f897431@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com/t/

Fixes: bd869245a3dc ("net: core: try to runtime-resume detached device in __dev_open")
Fixes: f32a21376573 ("ethtool: runtime-resume netdev parent before ethtool ioctl ops")
Tested-by: Martin Stolpe <martin.stolpe@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211220201844.2714498-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
index 1662c0985eca4..f854d41c6c94d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
@@ -9260,7 +9260,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused igb_suspend(struct device *dev)
 	return __igb_shutdown(to_pci_dev(dev), NULL, 0);
 }
 
-static int __maybe_unused igb_resume(struct device *dev)
+static int __maybe_unused __igb_resume(struct device *dev, bool rpm)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
 	struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
@@ -9303,17 +9303,24 @@ static int __maybe_unused igb_resume(struct device *dev)
 
 	wr32(E1000_WUS, ~0);
 
-	rtnl_lock();
+	if (!rpm)
+		rtnl_lock();
 	if (!err && netif_running(netdev))
 		err = __igb_open(netdev, true);
 
 	if (!err)
 		netif_device_attach(netdev);
-	rtnl_unlock();
+	if (!rpm)
+		rtnl_unlock();
 
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int __maybe_unused igb_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return __igb_resume(dev, false);
+}
+
 static int __maybe_unused igb_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct net_device *netdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
@@ -9332,7 +9339,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused igb_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
 
 static int __maybe_unused igb_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
-	return igb_resume(dev);
+	return __igb_resume(dev, true);
 }
 
 static void igb_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev)
@@ -9448,7 +9455,7 @@ static pci_ers_result_t igb_io_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev,
  *  @pdev: Pointer to PCI device
  *
  *  Restart the card from scratch, as if from a cold-boot. Implementation
- *  resembles the first-half of the igb_resume routine.
+ *  resembles the first-half of the __igb_resume routine.
  **/
 static pci_ers_result_t igb_io_slot_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
@@ -9488,7 +9495,7 @@ static pci_ers_result_t igb_io_slot_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev)
  *
  *  This callback is called when the error recovery driver tells us that
  *  its OK to resume normal operation. Implementation resembles the
- *  second-half of the igb_resume routine.
+ *  second-half of the __igb_resume routine.
  */
 static void igb_io_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
-- 
2.34.1