[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ycnji5pNLnA/YZbX@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 12:02:19 -0400
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Wells Lu 呂芳騰 <wells.lu@...plus.com>
Cc: Wells Lu <wellslutw@...il.com>,
"dvorkin@...bo.com" <dvorkin@...bo.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add dt-bindings for Sunplus
SP7021
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 12:44:25PM +0000, Wells Lu 呂芳騰 wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Thanks a lot for review.
>
> I ran 'make dt_binding_check' and got PASS before I submitted the dt-binding doc (yaml) file.
>
> I found the "dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:" is resulted from lack of vendor name in "vendor-prefixes.yaml".
>
> My colleague has submitted a patch for adding our company name to the yaml file. It was acknowledged by you but not yet committed into Linux tree.
>
> Refer to:
>
> On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:01:51 +0800, Qin Jian wrote:
> > Add vendor prefix for Sunplus Technology Co., Ltd.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qin Jian <qinjian@...lus1.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>
>
> Can this error be waived?
No. The patch for vendor prefix has to be applied before this one or
we'll keep getting this error.
> When I send a new patch, should I add "vendor-prefixes.yaml"?
As it doesn't look like that series is going to make 5.17?, I can apply
the vendor prefix patch.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists