[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ycn9AqoxPuKxHLZi@otcwcpicx3.sc.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 09:50:58 -0800
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] tools/objtool: Check for use of the ENQCMD
instruction in the kernel
Hi, Josh,
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 02:57:06PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:01:35PM +0000, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > The ENQCMD implicitly accesses the PASID_MSR to fill in the pasid field
> > of the descriptor being submitted to an accelerator. But there is no
> > precise (and stable across kernel changes) point at which the PASID_MSR
> > is updated from the value for one task to the next.
> >
> > Kernel code that uses accelerators must always use the ENQCMDS instruction
> > which does not access the PASID_MSR.
> >
> > Check for use of the ENQCMD instruction in the kernel and warn on its
> > usage.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Simplify handling ENQCMD (PeterZ and Josh)
>
> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Thank you!
-Fenghua
Powered by blists - more mailing lists