[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2112281845180.24929@hadrien>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 18:46:25 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
Francisco Jerez <currojerez@...eup.net>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: cpufreq: intel_pstate: map utilization into the pstate range
On Tue, 28 Dec 2021, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 5:58 PM Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr> wrote:
> >
> > I looked a bit more into why pstate 20 is always using the least energy. I
> > have just one thread spinning for 10 seconds, I use a fixed value for the
> > pstate, and I measure the energy usage with turbostat.
>
> How exactly do you fix the pstate?
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index e7af18857371..19440b15454c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -400,7 +402,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single_perf(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
sg_cpu->util = prev_util;
cpufreq_driver_adjust_perf(sg_cpu->cpu, map_util_perf(sg_cpu->bw_dl),
- map_util_perf(sg_cpu->util), sg_cpu->max);
+ sysctl_sched_fixedfreq, sg_cpu->max);
sg_cpu->sg_policy->last_freq_update_time = time;
}
------------------------------
sysctl_sched_fixedfreq is a variable that I added to sysfs.
>
> > I tried this on a
> > 2-socket Intel 6130 and a 4-socket Intel 6130. The experiment runs 40
> > times.
> >
> > There seem to be only two levels of CPU energy usage. On the 2-socket
> > machine the energy usage is around 600J up to pstate 20 and around 1000J
> > after that. On the 4-socket machine it is twice that.
>
> These are the package power numbers from turbostat, aren't they?
Yes.
julia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists