[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211228211501.468981-4-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 22:14:55 +0100
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tony0620emma@...il.com, kvalo@...eaurora.org,
johannes@...solutions.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Neo Jou <neojou@...il.com>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Pkshih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] rtw88: Move rtw_update_sta_info() out of rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter()
rtw_update_sta_info() internally access some registers while being
called unter an atomic lock acquired by rtw_iterate_vifs_atomic(). Move
rtw_update_sta_info() call out of (rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter) in
preparation for SDIO support where register access may sleep.
Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
- this patch is new in v2
- keep rtw_iterate_vifs_atomic() to prevent deadlocks as Johannes
suggested. Keep track of all relevant stations inside
rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter() and the iter-data and then call
rtw_update_sta_info() while held under rtwdev->mutex instead
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c
index ae7d97de5fdf..3bd12354a8a1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c
@@ -671,6 +671,8 @@ struct rtw_iter_bitrate_mask_data {
struct rtw_dev *rtwdev;
struct ieee80211_vif *vif;
const struct cfg80211_bitrate_mask *mask;
+ unsigned int num_si;
+ struct rtw_sta_info *si[RTW_MAX_MAC_ID_NUM];
};
static void rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter(void *data, struct ieee80211_sta *sta)
@@ -691,7 +693,8 @@ static void rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter(void *data, struct ieee80211_sta *sta)
}
si->use_cfg_mask = true;
- rtw_update_sta_info(br_data->rtwdev, si);
+
+ br_data->si[br_data->num_si++] = si;
}
static void rtw_ra_mask_info_update(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
@@ -699,11 +702,20 @@ static void rtw_ra_mask_info_update(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
const struct cfg80211_bitrate_mask *mask)
{
struct rtw_iter_bitrate_mask_data br_data;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex);
br_data.rtwdev = rtwdev;
br_data.vif = vif;
br_data.mask = mask;
+ br_data.num_si = 0;
rtw_iterate_stas_atomic(rtwdev, rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter, &br_data);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < br_data.num_si; i++)
+ rtw_update_sta_info(rtwdev, br_data.si[i]);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);
}
static int rtw_ops_set_bitrate_mask(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists