[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211229111730.GB25195@amd>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 12:17:30 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>,
Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 26/76] sfc: Check null pointer of rx_queue->page_ring
hi!
> From: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
>
> [ Upstream commit bdf1b5c3884f6a0dc91b0dbdb8c3b7d205f449e0 ]
>
> Because of the possible failure of the kcalloc, it should be better to
> set rx_queue->page_ptr_mask to 0 when it happens in order to maintain
> the consistency.
This is confusing/wrong, or at least not a complete fix.
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx_common.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,10 @@ static void efx_init_rx_recycle_ring(struct efx_rx_queue *rx_queue)
> efx->rx_bufs_per_page);
> rx_queue->page_ring = kcalloc(page_ring_size,
> sizeof(*rx_queue->page_ring), GFP_KERNEL);
> - rx_queue->page_ptr_mask = page_ring_size - 1;
> + if (!rx_queue->page_ring)
> + rx_queue->page_ptr_mask = 0;
> + else
> + rx_queue->page_ptr_mask = page_ring_size - 1;
> }
>
So we have !rx_queue->page_ring. But in efx_reuse_page, we do
index = rx_queue->page_remove & rx_queue->page_ptr_mask;
page = rx_queue->page_ring[index];
So index is now zero, but we'll derefernce null pointer anyway.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists