[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YcxjkhEN0BiicJsv@google.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:33:06 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 1/1] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Use CPU-id check instead
of _HRV check to differentiate variants
On Mon, 06 Dec 2021, Hans de Goede wrote:
> The Intel Crystal Cove PMIC has 2 different variants, one for use with
> Bay Trail (BYT) SoCs and one for use with Cherry Trail (CHT) SoCs.
>
> So far we have been using an ACPI _HRV check to differentiate between
> the 2, but at least on the Microsoft Surface 3, which is a CHT device,
> the wrong _HRV value is reported by ACPI.
>
> So instead switch to a CPU-ID check which avoids us relying on the
> possibly wrong ACPI _HRV value.
>
> Reported-by: Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
I switched these around (same with the other patches).
> ---
> drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c | 28 +++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists