[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YcyIidlnW4Sh6CGm@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 18:10:49 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: andrzej.hajda@...el.com, narmstrong@...libre.com,
robert.foss@...aro.org, jonas@...boo.se, jernej.skrabec@...il.com,
airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, marex@...x.de,
frieder.schrempf@...tron.de, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/bridge: sn65dsi83: Fix an error handling path in
sn65dsi83_probe()
Hi Christophe,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 09:58:44AM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> sn65dsi83_parse_dt() takes a reference on 'ctx->host_node' that must be
> released in the error handling path of this function and of the probe.
> This is only done in the remove function up to now.
>
> Fixes: ceb515ba29ba ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add TI SN65DSI83 and SN65DSI84 driver")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> ---
> v2: add error handling in sn65dsi83_parse_dt() [Laurent Pinchart]
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> index 945f08de45f1..314a84ffcea3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> @@ -560,10 +560,14 @@ static int sn65dsi83_parse_dt(struct sn65dsi83 *ctx, enum sn65dsi83_model model)
> ctx->host_node = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(endpoint);
> of_node_put(endpoint);
>
> - if (ctx->dsi_lanes < 0 || ctx->dsi_lanes > 4)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - if (!ctx->host_node)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + if (ctx->dsi_lanes < 0 || ctx->dsi_lanes > 4) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_put_node;
> + }
> + if (!ctx->host_node) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_put_node;
> + }
>
> ctx->lvds_dual_link = false;
> ctx->lvds_dual_link_even_odd_swap = false;
> @@ -590,16 +594,22 @@ static int sn65dsi83_parse_dt(struct sn65dsi83 *ctx, enum sn65dsi83_model model)
>
> ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dev->of_node, 2, 0, &panel, &panel_bridge);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto err_put_node;
> if (panel) {
> panel_bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(dev, panel);
> - if (IS_ERR(panel_bridge))
> - return PTR_ERR(panel_bridge);
> + if (IS_ERR(panel_bridge)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(panel_bridge);
> + goto err_put_node;
> + }
> }
>
> ctx->panel_bridge = panel_bridge;
>
> return 0;
> +
> +err_put_node:
> + of_node_put(ctx->host_node);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int sn65dsi83_host_attach(struct sn65dsi83 *ctx)
> @@ -673,8 +683,10 @@ static int sn65dsi83_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> return ret;
>
> ctx->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &sn65dsi83_regmap_config);
> - if (IS_ERR(ctx->regmap))
> - return PTR_ERR(ctx->regmap);
> + if (IS_ERR(ctx->regmap)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(ctx->regmap);
> + goto err_put_node;
> + }
>
> dev_set_drvdata(dev, ctx);
> i2c_set_clientdata(client, ctx);
> @@ -691,6 +703,8 @@ static int sn65dsi83_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>
> err_remove_bridge:
> drm_bridge_remove(&ctx->bridge);
> +err_put_node:
> + of_node_put(ctx->host_node);
> return ret;
> }
>
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists