[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ycy4q2OhwTdLl+2S@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 20:36:11 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/build: use the proper name CONFIG_FW_LOADER
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 12:15:53PM +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> Commit c8dcf655ec81 ("x86/build: Tuck away built-in firmware under
> FW_LOADER") intends to add the expression regex only when FW_LOADER is
> built-in, not a module or disabled.
>
> The config is called CONFIG_FW_LOADER when it is built-in; and
> CONFIG_FW_LOADER_MODULE when it is a module.
$ git grep FW_LOADER_MODULE
include/linux/firmware.h:37:#if defined(CONFIG_FW_LOADER) || (defined(CONFIG_FW_LOADER_MODULE) && defined(MODULE))
So either I'm not grepping right or that FW_LOADER_MODULE thing belongs
to the past...
Greg, Luis, what's up?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists