lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 Dec 2021 22:36:27 +0100
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To:     Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: fsl: scu: Add i.MX8QM rtc binding

On 21/12/2021 14:15:46+0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> Add i.MX8QM rtc compatible to the SCU bindings documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt
> index f1470d562156..4633be2182dd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt
> @@ -134,7 +134,9 @@ RTC bindings based on SCU Message Protocol
>  ------------------------------------------------------------
>  
>  Required properties:
> -- compatible: should be "fsl,imx8qxp-sc-rtc";
> +- compatible:		Should be one of:
> +			"fsl,imx8qm-sc-rtc",
> +			"fsl,imx8qxp-sc-rtc".

Are the imx8qm and imx8qxp SCU actually different? I would hope you
won't had a third messaging protocol for the RTC...


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ