lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211230075014.GA25567@87202af68ceb>
Date:   Thu, 30 Dec 2021 15:50:14 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH goldwynr] btrfs: btrfs_buffered_read_iomap_ops can be
 static

fs/btrfs/inode.c:8440:24: warning: symbol 'btrfs_buffered_read_iomap_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?

Fixes: 3f7d55b62cad ("btrfs: iomap_begin() for buffered read")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
---
 inode.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index b50cf3192fa9e..ca8df86d42002 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -8437,7 +8437,7 @@ static int btrfs_read_iomap_end(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-const struct iomap_ops btrfs_buffered_read_iomap_ops = {
+static const struct iomap_ops btrfs_buffered_read_iomap_ops = {
 	.iomap_begin = btrfs_read_iomap_begin,
 	.iomap_end = btrfs_read_iomap_end,
 };

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ