[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec202938-5972-d74e-a17c-256420350eb8@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 17:36:58 +0100
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Wen Zhiwei <wenzhiwei@...inos.cn>, alexander.deucher@....com,
Xinhui.Pan@....com, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch
Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpu/drm/radeon:Fix null pointer risk
Am 28.12.21 um 08:31 schrieb Wen Zhiwei:
> If the null pointer is not judged in advance,
> there is a risk that the pointer will cross
> the boundary
As far as I can see that case is impossible, why do you want to add a
check for it?
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Zhiwei <wenzhiwei@...inos.cn>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vm.c
> index bb53016f3138..d3d342041adf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vm.c
> @@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ int radeon_vm_bo_update(struct radeon_device *rdev,
>
> if (mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_TT) {
> bo_va->flags |= RADEON_VM_PAGE_SYSTEM;
> - if (!(bo_va->bo->flags & (RADEON_GEM_GTT_WC | RADEON_GEM_GTT_UC)))
> + if (bo_va->bo && !(bo_va->bo->flags & (RADEON_GEM_GTT_WC | RADEON_GEM_GTT_UC)))
> bo_va->flags |= RADEON_VM_PAGE_SNOOPED;
>
> } else {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists