[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFP8O3K1mkiCGMTEeuSifZtr2piHsKTjP5TOA25nqpv2SrbzYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 10:31:27 -0800
From: Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray@...gle.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Bruce Schlobohm <bruce.schlobohm@...el.com>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@...tuozzo.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Marios Pomonis <pomonis@...gle.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/15] livepatch: use `-z unique-symbol` if available
to nuke pos-based search
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 3:11 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 01:21:56AM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > [PATCH v9 02/15] livepatch: use `-z unique-symbol` if available to nuke pos-based search
>
> nuke?
>
> I think you wanna say something about avoiding position-based search if
> toolchain supports -z ...
>
> > Position-based search, which means that if we have several symbols
> > with the same name, we additionally need to provide an "index" of
> > the desired symbol, is fragile. Par exemple, it breaks when two
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> We already have hard time with the English in commit messages, let's
> avoid the French pls.
>
> > symbols with the same name are located in different sections.
> >
> > Since a while, LD has a flag `-z unique-symbol` which appends
> > numeric suffixes to the functions with the same name (in symtab
> > and strtab).
> > Check for its availability and always prefer when the livepatching
> > is on.
>
> Why only then?
>
> It looks to me like we want this unconditionally, no?
>
> > This needs a little adjustment to the modpost to make it
> > strip suffixes before adding exports.
> >
> > depmod needs some treatment as well, tho its false-positibe warnings
>
> Unknown word [false-positibe] in commit message, suggestions:
> ['false-positive', 'false-positioned', 'prepositional']
>
> Please introduce a spellchecker into your patch creation workflow.
>
> > about unknown symbols are harmless and don't alter the return code.
> > And there is a bunch more livepatch code to optimize-out after
> > introducing this, but let's leave it for later.
>
> ...
>
> > @@ -171,17 +173,21 @@ static int klp_find_object_symbol(const char *objname, const char *name,
> >
> > /*
> > * Ensure an address was found. If sympos is 0, ensure symbol is unique;
> > - * otherwise ensure the symbol position count matches sympos.
> > + * otherwise ensure the symbol position count matches sympos. If the LD
> > + * `-z unique` flag is enabled, sympos checks are not relevant.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> -z unique-symbol
>
> > */
> > - if (args.addr == 0)
> > + if (args.addr == 0) {
> > pr_err("symbol '%s' not found in symbol table\n", name);
> > - else if (args.count > 1 && sympos == 0) {
> > + } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LD_HAS_Z_UNIQUE_SYMBOL)) {
> > + goto out_ok;
>
> This is silly - just do it all here.
>
> > + } else if (args.count > 1 && sympos == 0) {
> > pr_err("unresolvable ambiguity for symbol '%s' in object '%s'\n",
> > name, objname);
> > } else if (sympos != args.count && sympos > 0) {
> > pr_err("symbol position %lu for symbol '%s' in object '%s' not found\n",
> > sympos, name, objname ? objname : "vmlinux");
> > } else {
> > +out_ok:
> > *addr = args.addr;
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> Looks straight-forward otherwise but I'm no livepatcher so I'd prefer if
> they have a look too.
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
>
Apologies since I haven't read the patch series.
The option does not exist in ld.lld and I am a bit concerning about
its semantics: https://maskray.me/blog/2020-11-15-explain-gnu-linker-options#z-unique-symbol
I thought that someone forwarded my comments (originally posted months
on a feature request ago) here but seems not.
(I am a ld.lld maintainer.)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists