[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1652249414.215435.1640899947744.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 22:32:27 +0100 (CET)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: chengzhihao1 <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
Cc: libaokun <libaokun1@...wei.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
yukuai3 <yukuai3@...wei.com>, Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next V3] ubi: fix race condition between
ctrl_cdev_ioctl and ubi_cdev_ioctl
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "chengzhihao1" <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
> kernfs_drain() will wait 'root->deactivate_waitq' if
> atomic_read(&kn->active) not equals to KN_DEACTIVATED_BIAS.
>
> The UBI seq_show callback is invoked with avtive cnt taken:
> vfs_read
> kernfs_fop_read_iter
> seq_read_iter
> m->op->start (kernfs_seq_start) // kernfs_get_active(of->kn)
> kernfs_seq_show
> dev_attribute_show [ubi]
> m->op->stop (kernfs_seq_stop) // kernfs_put_active(of->kn)
>
> The kernfs_drain() is stuck at wait_event() until sysfs reading
> finished, in my local test.
You are right. This means UBI does this extra check in vain.
Maybe even since ever.
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists