[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yc8PRcFFSvIev0c5@krava>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 15:10:13 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: yaowenbin <yaowenbin1@...wei.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hewenliang4@...wei.com, wuxu.wu@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf top: add concurrent access protection of the SLsmg
screen management
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 04:55:19PM +0800, yaowenbin wrote:
> When the following command is executed several times, a coredump file is generated.
> $ timeout -k 9 5 perf top -e task-clock
> *******
> *******
> *******
> 0.01% [kernel] [k] __do_softirq
> 0.01% libpthread-2.28.so [.] __pthread_mutex_lock
> 0.01% [kernel] [k] __ll_sc_atomic64_sub_return
> double free or corruption (!prev) perf top --sort comm,dso
> timeout: the monitored command dumped core
>
> When we terminate "perf top" using sending signal method, SLsmg_reset_smg
> function is called. SLsmg_reset_smg resets the SLsmg screen management routines
> by freeing all memory allocated while it was active. However SLsmg_reinit_smg
> function maybe be called by another thread. SLsmg_reinit_smg function will
> free the same memory accessed by SLsmg_reset_smg functon, thus it results
> in double free. SLsmg_reinit_smg function is called already protected by
> ui__lock, so we fix the problem by adding pthread_mutex_trylock of ui__lock
> when calling SLsmg_reset_smg function.
>
> Signed-off-by: yaowenbin <yaowenbin1@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: hewenliang <hewenliang4@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wenyu Liu <liuwenyu7@...wei.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/ui/tui/setup.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/tui/setup.c b/tools/perf/ui/tui/setup.c
> index d4ac41679..1fdf92062 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/ui/tui/setup.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/ui/tui/setup.c
> @@ -170,9 +170,11 @@ void ui__exit(bool wait_for_ok)
> "Press any key...", 0);
>
> SLtt_set_cursor_visibility(1);
> - SLsmg_refresh();
> - SLsmg_reset_smg();
> + if (!pthread_mutex_trylock(&ui__lock)) {
trylock because it can be called from signal, right?
could you plase add some comment about that
thanks,
jirka
> + SLsmg_refresh();
> + SLsmg_reset_smg();
> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&ui__lock);
> + }
> SLang_reset_tty();
> -
> perf_error__unregister(&perf_tui_eops);
> }
> --
> 2.27.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists