lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <268b05c1-846e-c229-277c-140c13fc87dc@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 1 Jan 2022 00:15:25 +0800
From:   Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
To:     Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:     balbi@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
        jj251510319013@...il.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] usb: gadget: clear related members when goto fail

I get that. I will fix and resubmit my patch.

Thanks again.

On 2021/12/31 下午11:57, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 10:31:51AM +0800, Hangyu Hua wrote:
>> On 2021/12/31 上午3:46, Alan Stern wrote:
> 
>>>> @@ -1892,7 +1895,12 @@ dev_config (struct file *fd, const char __user *buf, size_t len, loff_t *ptr)
>>>>       }
>>>>       return value;
>>>>
>>>> +fail2:
>>>> +    dev->dev = NULL;
>>>> +fail1:
>>>> +    dev->hs_config = NULL;
>>>
>>> It is not necessary to have all these different statement labels.  You
>>> can simply have "fail:" clear all three pointers.
> 
>> I don't think so. It is not necessary to clean all three pointers if
>> some of them aren't kbuf. I think it may be better to keep their own
>> pointers.
> 
> If the pointers aren't set to a region inside kbuf then they are
> meaningless.  There is no reason to keep the old values.  It is better
> to avoid multiple unnecessary statement labels.
> 
> Alan Stern
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ