lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 18:22:23 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, mingo@...hat.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, jonathan.lemon@...il.com, alobakin@...me, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, talalahmad@...gle.com, haokexin@...il.com, Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>, atenart@...nel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de, Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>, arnd@...db.de, vvs@...tuozzo.com, Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Mengen Sun <mengensun@...cent.com>, mungerjiang@...cent.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/3] net: skb: introduce kfree_skb_with_reason() On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 14:35:31 +0800 Menglong Dong wrote: > > > void skb_release_head_state(struct sk_buff *skb); > > > void kfree_skb(struct sk_buff *skb); > > > > Should this be turned into a static inline calling > > kfree_skb_with_reason() now? BTW you should drop the > > '_with'. > > > > I thought about it before, but I'm a little afraid that some users may trace > kfree_skb() with kprobe, making it inline may not be friendly to them? Hm, there is a bpf sample which does that, but that's probably not commonly used given there is a tracepoint. If someone is using a kprobe they can switch to kprobing kfree_skb*reason().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists