linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] net: mdio: add helpers to extract clause 45 regad and devad fields

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 1 Jan 2022 17:41:07 +0000
From:   Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Michael Lee <igvtee@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] net: mdio: add helpers to extract clause 45 regad
 and devad fields

On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 06:18:54PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 08:52:35PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > Add a couple of helpers and definitions to extract the clause 45 regad
> > and devad fields from the regnum passed into MDIO drivers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> 
> This email has me confused. It seems to be coming directly from
> Russell, but is part of a patchset? Then there is a second 1/3 later
> in the patchset?

That happened by accident when using git-send-email and hence the
first time it was sent with Russell's From: in the RFC822 headers it
was (rightly) rejected.
I noticed that shortly after and resend the patch with my sender
address set as From: in the RFC822 headers and Russell's From: in the
mail body for only git, and not mailservers, to care about.

Sorry for that additional noise.