[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6e78ed8aef3240a2cbacb3e424c6470336253e47.1641157546.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2022 22:07:05 +0100
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: jdmason@...zu.us, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, liuhangbin@...il.com,
colin.king@...el.com, zhengyongjun3@...wei.com,
paskripkin@...il.com, arnd@...db.de
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] net: vxge: Use dma_set_mask_and_coherent() and simplify code
Use dma_set_mask_and_coherent() instead of unrolling it with some
dma_set_mask()+dma_set_coherent_mask().
Moreover, as stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask will never
fail if dev->dma_mask is non-NULL.
So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same reason.
That said, 'high_dma' can only be 1 after a successful
dma_set_mask_and_coherent().
Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly, including a now
useless parameter to vxge_device_register().
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
---
In vxge_device_register(), "ndev->features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA;" can
certainly be moved a few lines above and merged with
"dev->features |= ndev->hw_features | ..."
However, as I can not test this change, I've left it as is to avoid
potential side effects.
---
.../net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c | 27 +++----------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c
index 2c2e9e56ed4e..aa7c093f1f91 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c
@@ -3349,7 +3349,7 @@ static const struct net_device_ops vxge_netdev_ops = {
};
static int vxge_device_register(struct __vxge_hw_device *hldev,
- struct vxge_config *config, int high_dma,
+ struct vxge_config *config,
int no_of_vpath, struct vxgedev **vdev_out)
{
struct net_device *ndev;
@@ -3421,11 +3421,7 @@ static int vxge_device_register(struct __vxge_hw_device *hldev,
vxge_debug_init(vxge_hw_device_trace_level_get(hldev),
"%s : checksumming enabled", __func__);
- if (high_dma) {
- ndev->features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA;
- vxge_debug_init(vxge_hw_device_trace_level_get(hldev),
- "%s : using High DMA", __func__);
- }
+ ndev->features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA;
/* MTU range: 68 - 9600 */
ndev->min_mtu = VXGE_HW_MIN_MTU;
@@ -4282,7 +4278,6 @@ vxge_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *pre)
struct __vxge_hw_device *hldev;
enum vxge_hw_status status;
int ret;
- int high_dma = 0;
u64 vpath_mask = 0;
struct vxgedev *vdev;
struct vxge_config *ll_config = NULL;
@@ -4372,22 +4367,9 @@ vxge_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *pre)
goto _exit0;
}
- if (!dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
+ if (!dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
vxge_debug_ll_config(VXGE_TRACE,
"%s : using 64bit DMA", __func__);
-
- high_dma = 1;
-
- if (dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
- vxge_debug_init(VXGE_ERR,
- "%s : unable to obtain 64bit DMA for "
- "consistent allocations", __func__);
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto _exit1;
- }
- } else if (!dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
- vxge_debug_ll_config(VXGE_TRACE,
- "%s : using 32bit DMA", __func__);
} else {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto _exit1;
@@ -4555,8 +4537,7 @@ vxge_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *pre)
ll_config->tx_pause_enable = VXGE_PAUSE_CTRL_ENABLE;
ll_config->rx_pause_enable = VXGE_PAUSE_CTRL_ENABLE;
- ret = vxge_device_register(hldev, ll_config, high_dma, no_of_vpath,
- &vdev);
+ ret = vxge_device_register(hldev, ll_config, no_of_vpath, &vdev);
if (ret) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto _exit4;
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists