linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 04/17] mtd: spinand: Rename 'op_templates' to 'data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220103104805.17dd390d@collabora.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Jan 2022 10:48:05 +0100
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To:     Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@...com>
Cc:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>,
        Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>,
        Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>,
        Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>,
        <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <p.yadav@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/17] mtd: spinand: Rename 'op_templates' to
 'data_ops'

On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 13:12:37 +0530
Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@...com> wrote:

> Manufacturers have been deviating from the standard SPI operations for
> NAND flashes. There have been variations in non-page read/write
> instructions too. Additionally, operations, including non-page r/w ops,
> vary when flash is in different SPI mode, eg. Octal DTR.
> 
> To avoid live-patching in hot-paths or vendor-specific adjustment,
> it is better to have a set of operation templates and variants for
> non-page read/write operations as well. These would get initialized at
> the probe time or when flash changes modes. These would be called
> 'ctrl_ops'.
> 
> To make code better understandable, create two types of op templates
> which are: data_ops and ctrl_ops. Reason for having two different type
> of templates is the difference in their use cases i.e. it is possible
> to have ops of different protocol for read/write/update simulatneously
> in the data_ops, but all the ops in the ctrl_ops follow same protocol.
> 
> Rename op_templates to data_ops, and the ctrl_ops would be introduced
> in later commits.

Didn't read till the end, but I don't see any overlap between the
control and data operations in the first half of this series, so I'm
wondering if the split is actually necessary.