[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKXUXMy=M42hapfG1S4ZT1v5WEdH2KYiF8Cgukmf48=FKFCyJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 13:38:28 +0100
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Potentially broken error path in bio_map_user_iov()
Dear Christoph,
in the function bio_map_user_iov() in ./block/blk-map.c, there is an
error branch for unlikely(offs & queue_dma_alignment(rq->q)), where
the supposingly expected error return value of the function is set,
i.e., ret = -EINVAL;. However, the variable ret is unconditionally
reset by the blk_rq_append_bio(...) call below, so that this 'ret =
-EINVAL;' assignment has no effect.
I am unsure which control flow you expect for this error case through
the bio_map_user_iov() function. Maybe you just want a patch like this
below to return the error code if it is at least once set?
diff --git a/block/blk-map.c b/block/blk-map.c
index 4526adde0156..4a3f6703f46f 100644
--- a/block/blk-map.c
+++ b/block/blk-map.c
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static int bio_map_user_iov(struct request *rq,
struct iov_iter *iter,
{
unsigned int max_sectors = queue_max_hw_sectors(rq->q);
struct bio *bio;
- int ret;
+ int ret = 0;
int j;
if (!iov_iter_count(iter))
@@ -296,6 +296,9 @@ static int bio_map_user_iov(struct request *rq,
struct iov_iter *iter,
break;
}
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_unmap;
+
ret = blk_rq_append_bio(rq, bio);
if (ret)
goto out_unmap;
I know too little about this function and its intent to create a
proper patch, though.
I also looked at the previous versions, but the error code of this
error branch was really never effectively returned before either (as
far as I grasped the earlier versions of this function). So, this
error path probably never worked as intended.
Best regards,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists