[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220103135400.4p5ezn3ntgpefuan@box.shutemov.name>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 16:54:00 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0000/2297] [ANNOUNCE, RFC] "Fast Kernel Headers" Tree
-v1: Eliminate the Linux kernel's "Dependency Hell"
On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 10:57:35PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> - As to testing & runtime behavior: while all of these patches are
> intended to be bug-free, I did find a couple of semi-bugs in the kernel
> where a specific order of headers guaranteed a particular code
> generation outcome - and if that header order was disturbed, the kernel
> would silently break and fail to boot ...
Looks like you are doing a lot of uninlining. Do you see any runtime
performance degradation with the patchset?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists