[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220103142053.731988917@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 15:23:44 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, k2ci <kernel-bot@...inos.cn>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Jackie Liu <liuyun01@...inos.cn>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 07/48] memblock: fix memblock_phys_alloc() section mismatch error
From: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@...inos.cn>
[ Upstream commit d7f55471db2719629f773c2d6b5742a69595bfd3 ]
Fix modpost Section mismatch error in memblock_phys_alloc()
[...]
WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x1dcc): Section mismatch in reference
from the function memblock_phys_alloc() to the function .init.text:memblock_phys_alloc_range()
The function memblock_phys_alloc() references
the function __init memblock_phys_alloc_range().
This is often because memblock_phys_alloc lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of memblock_phys_alloc_range is wrong.
ERROR: modpost: Section mismatches detected.
Set CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH_WARN_ONLY=y to allow them.
[...]
memblock_phys_alloc() is a one-line wrapper, make it __always_inline to
avoid these section mismatches.
Reported-by: k2ci <kernel-bot@...inos.cn>
Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@...inos.cn>
[rppt: slightly massaged changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211217020754.2874872-1-liu.yun@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/memblock.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index 1a8d25f2e0412..3baea2ef33fbb 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -387,8 +387,8 @@ phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_range_nid(phys_addr_t size,
phys_addr_t end, int nid, bool exact_nid);
phys_addr_t memblock_phys_alloc_try_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid);
-static inline phys_addr_t memblock_phys_alloc(phys_addr_t size,
- phys_addr_t align)
+static __always_inline phys_addr_t memblock_phys_alloc(phys_addr_t size,
+ phys_addr_t align)
{
return memblock_phys_alloc_range(size, align, 0,
MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists