lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220103142053.731988917@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  3 Jan 2022 15:23:44 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, k2ci <kernel-bot@...inos.cn>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Jackie Liu <liuyun01@...inos.cn>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 07/48] memblock: fix memblock_phys_alloc() section mismatch error

From: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@...inos.cn>

[ Upstream commit d7f55471db2719629f773c2d6b5742a69595bfd3 ]

Fix modpost Section mismatch error in memblock_phys_alloc()

[...]
WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x1dcc): Section mismatch in reference
from the function memblock_phys_alloc() to the function .init.text:memblock_phys_alloc_range()
The function memblock_phys_alloc() references
the function __init memblock_phys_alloc_range().
This is often because memblock_phys_alloc lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of memblock_phys_alloc_range is wrong.

ERROR: modpost: Section mismatches detected.
Set CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH_WARN_ONLY=y to allow them.
[...]

memblock_phys_alloc() is a one-line wrapper, make it __always_inline to
avoid these section mismatches.

Reported-by: k2ci <kernel-bot@...inos.cn>
Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@...inos.cn>
[rppt: slightly massaged changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211217020754.2874872-1-liu.yun@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/memblock.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index 1a8d25f2e0412..3baea2ef33fbb 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -387,8 +387,8 @@ phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_range_nid(phys_addr_t size,
 				      phys_addr_t end, int nid, bool exact_nid);
 phys_addr_t memblock_phys_alloc_try_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid);
 
-static inline phys_addr_t memblock_phys_alloc(phys_addr_t size,
-					      phys_addr_t align)
+static __always_inline phys_addr_t memblock_phys_alloc(phys_addr_t size,
+						       phys_addr_t align)
 {
 	return memblock_phys_alloc_range(size, align, 0,
 					 MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE);
-- 
2.34.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ