lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220103095554.34602944@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date:   Mon, 3 Jan 2022 09:55:54 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        workflows@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] docs: add a document about regression
 handling

On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:20:23 +0100 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 03.01.22 18:07, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon,  3 Jan 2022 10:50:50 +0100 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:  
> >> +How to see which regressions regzbot tracks currently?
> >> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> +
> >> +Check `regzbot's web-interface <https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/regzbot/>`_
> >> +for the latest info; alternatively, `search for the latest regression report
> >> +<https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/?q=%22Linux+regressions+report%22+f%3Aregzbot>`_,
> >> +which regzbot normally sends out once a week on Sunday evening (UTC), which is a
> >> +few hours before Linus usually publishes new (pre-)releases.  
> > 
> > Cool, I wonder if it would be a useful feature to be able to filter by
> > mailing lists involved or such to give maintainers a quick overview of
> > regressions they are on the hook for?  
> 
> Ha, that's a great idea, many thx. I have been scratching my head for a
> while already how to give maintainers a better overview, but the only
> thing I came up with was "check the merge path a commit causing the
> regression took", which has a few obvious downsides (it for example
> won't work if the culprit is not known yet). This should work a lot better.
> 
> But be warned, will likely take a few weeks (months?) before I get to
> implement that: I have less time to work on the regzbot code than in the
> past weeks, as I have to take care of a few other things first (most of
> them related to regzbot).

No worries, do ping when you got it ready tho :)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ