[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220103185626.GA15548@kbox>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 10:56:26 -0800
From: Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/12] user_events: Add print_fmt generation support
for basic types
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:30:30AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 09:35:01 -0800
> Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > Addes print_fmt format generation for basic types that are supported for
> > user processes. Only supports sizes that are the same on 32 and 64 bit.
>
> Is the last sentence for user_events itself, or only limiting the
> print_fmt but user_events supports it?
>
It's only for print_fmt to prevent incorrect decoding at that level, as
we discussed previously.
> The code looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
>
> Thank you,
>
Thanks,
-Beau
Powered by blists - more mailing lists