linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scripts: kernel-doc: transform documentation into POD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220104005613.227f0432@fuji.fritz.box>
Date:   Tue, 4 Jan 2022 00:56:13 +0100
From:   Tomasz Warniełło <tomasz.warniello@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: kernel-doc: transform documentation into POD

On Mon, 03 Jan 2022 14:57:48 -0700
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:

> One thread per version is good; please do not post new versions to old
> threads.  A tool like "git send-email" can be your friend here.  See
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for lots of details on how
> to submit patches.

Ok, thanks. I'll try to do it correctly this time...

> Along these lines, I appreciate that you broke up the series as I
> requested, but you overdid it a bit.  Think in terms of logical changes
> and making things easy to review, and you should be able to coalesce
> things a bit.

I'm not good at guessing what seems logical to others, especially those I
don't know much. No sarcasm here. Luckily it's not that many of them, so
hopefully they'll pass the exam overdone as they are.

> >>  - Stick with current coding conventions  
> >
> > To be honest, I need to think this over.  
> 
> Think hard; if you're unable to work with the kernel project's
> conventions, there's not a lot of point in resubmitting the patches. 

Let's finish this one together.

As for the actual code corrections, I see I put 1 tab too many in
two places in the last version. So I guess I just need to reduce them
by 1? No sarcasm again... So let me know before I've sent the next version,
if you please.

Ch, TW