[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YdSbDTcA6qyZdJJv@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 13:07:57 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@...il.com>
Cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, jirislaby@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, festevam@...il.com,
abel.vesa@....com, olof@...om.net, kernel@...gutronix.de,
stefan@...er.ch, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-imx@....com,
Mr.Bossman075@...il.com, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, arnd@...db.de,
soc@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, sboyd@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
giulio.benetti@...ettiengineering.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
aisheng.dong@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/7] dt-bindings: clock: imx: Add documentation for
i.MXRT1050 clock
On Mon, 03 Jan 2022 18:39:45 -0500, Jesse Taube wrote:
> From: Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@...il.com>
>
> Add DT binding documentation for i.MXRT1050 clock driver.
>
> Cc: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ettiengineering.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube <Mr.Bossman075@...il.com>
> ---
> V1->V2:
> * Replace macros with values
> V2->V3:
> * Remove anatop
> * Use lpuart not gpt
> * include imxrt1050-clock.h
> * 2 space tabs to 4
> * Remove oneOf enum
> * Change maxItems to 2
> V3->V4:
> * Nothing done
> V4->V5:
> * Remove extra newline
> * Rename ccm to clock-controller
> * Change minItems to const
> * Change minItems to description
> * Rename file to add 1050
> * Change commit description to just 1050
> V5->V6:
> * Add maxItems for clocks description
> V6->V7:
> * Nothing done
> ---
> .../bindings/clock/imxrt1050-clock.yaml | 67 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imxrt1050-clock.yaml
>
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists