[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220104192614.GL2328285@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 15:26:14 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, rafael@...nel.org,
Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@....nxp.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@...il.com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/14] PCI: portdrv: Suppress kernel DMA ownership
auto-claiming
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 11:06:31AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > The existing vfio framework allows the portdrv driver to be bound
> > to the bridge while its downstream devices are assigned to user space.
>
> I.e., the existing VFIO framework allows a switch to be in the same
> IOMMU group as the devices below it, even though the switch has a
> kernel driver and the other devices may have userspace drivers?
Yes, this patch exists to maintain current VFIO behavior which has this
same check.
I belive the basis for VFIO doing this is that the these devices
cannot do DMA, so don't care about the DMA API or the group->domain,
and do not expose MMIO memory so do not care about the P2P attack.
A comment in the code to this effect would be good, IMHO.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists