linux-kernel - [PATCH 6/7] mailbox: imx: introduce rxdb callback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220104062547.2103016-7-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Date:   Tue,  4 Jan 2022 14:25:46 +0800
From:   "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
To:     jassisinghbrar@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org
Cc:     s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
        linux-imx@....com, aisheng.dong@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] mailbox: imx: introduce rxdb callback

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>

Add a rxdb callback to prepare for i.MX8 SECO MU rxdb which has a
different logic.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
---
 drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
index e8a212d0da2f..a727eee49563 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ enum imx_mu_type {
 struct imx_mu_dcfg {
 	int (*tx)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp, void *data);
 	int (*rx)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp);
+	int (*rxdb)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp);
 	void (*init)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv);
 	enum imx_mu_type type;
 	u32	xTR;		/* Transmit Register0 */
@@ -179,6 +180,16 @@ static int imx_mu_generic_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int imx_mu_generic_rxdb(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
+			       struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp)
+{
+	imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx),
+		     priv->dcfg->xSR[IMX_MU_GSR]);
+	mbox_chan_received_data(cp->chan, NULL);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int imx_mu_specific_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp, void *data)
 {
 	u32 *arg = data;
@@ -329,9 +340,7 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
 		priv->dcfg->rx(priv, cp);
 	} else if ((val == IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx)) &&
 		   (cp->type == IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB)) {
-		imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx),
-			     priv->dcfg->xSR[IMX_MU_GSR]);
-		mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL);
+		priv->dcfg->rxdb(priv, cp);
 	} else {
 		dev_warn_ratelimited(priv->dev, "Not handled interrupt\n");
 		return IRQ_NONE;
@@ -639,6 +648,7 @@ static int imx_mu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx = {
 	.tx	= imx_mu_generic_tx,
 	.rx	= imx_mu_generic_rx,
+	.rxdb	= imx_mu_generic_rxdb,
 	.init	= imx_mu_init_generic,
 	.xTR	= 0x0,
 	.xRR	= 0x10,
@@ -649,6 +659,7 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx = {
 static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
 	.tx	= imx_mu_generic_tx,
 	.rx	= imx_mu_generic_rx,
+	.rxdb	= imx_mu_generic_rxdb,
 	.init	= imx_mu_init_generic,
 	.xTR	= 0x20,
 	.xRR	= 0x40,
@@ -659,7 +670,9 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
 static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx8ulp = {
 	.tx	= imx_mu_generic_tx,
 	.rx	= imx_mu_generic_rx,
+	.rxdb	= imx_mu_generic_rxdb,
 	.init	= imx_mu_init_generic,
+	.rxdb	= imx_mu_generic_rxdb,
 	.type	= IMX_MU_V2,
 	.xTR	= 0x200,
 	.xRR	= 0x280,
@@ -682,6 +695,7 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx8_scu = {
 	.tx	= imx_mu_specific_tx,
 	.rx	= imx_mu_specific_rx,
 	.init	= imx_mu_init_specific,
+	.rxdb	= imx_mu_generic_rxdb,
 	.xTR	= 0x0,
 	.xRR	= 0x10,
 	.xSR	= {0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20},
-- 
2.25.1