[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db9d1418-46eb-94b3-5003-1add9b2b8dc8@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 14:30:50 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: Zhiqiang Hou <Zhiqiang.Hou@....com>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: endpoint: Fix alignment fault error in copy tests
On 17/12/21 3:17 pm, Zhiqiang Hou wrote:
> From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@....com>
>
> In the copy tests, it uses the memcpy() to copy data between
> IO memory space. This can cause the alignment fualt error
> (pasted the error logs below) due to the memcpy() may use
> unaligned accesses.
>
> Alignment fault error logs:
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff8000101cd3c1
> Mem abort info:
> ESR = 0x96000021
> EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> SET = 0, FnV = 0
> EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> FSC = 0x21: alignment fault
> Data abort info:
> ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000021
> CM = 0, WnR = 0
> swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000081773000
> [ffff8000101cd3c1] pgd=1000000082410003, p4d=1000000082410003, pud=1000000082411003, pmd=1000000082412003, pte=0068004000001f13
> Internal error: Oops: 96000021 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/0:0H Not tainted 5.15.0-rc1-next-20210914-dirty #2
> Hardware name: LS1012A RDB Board (DT)
> Workqueue: kpcitest pci_epf_test_cmd_handler
> pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> pc : __memcpy+0x168/0x230
> lr : pci_epf_test_cmd_handler+0x6f0/0xa68
> sp : ffff80001003bce0
> x29: ffff80001003bce0 x28: ffff800010135000 x27: ffff8000101e5000
> x26: ffff8000101cd000 x25: ffff6cda941cf6c8 x24: 0000000000000000
> x23: ffff6cda863f2000 x22: ffff6cda9096c800 x21: ffff800010135000
> x20: ffff6cda941cf680 x19: ffffaf39fd999000 x18: 0000000000000000
> x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: ffffaf39fd2b6000
> x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 15f5c8fa2f984d57 x12: 604d132b60275454
> x11: 065cee5e5fb428b6 x10: aae662eb17d0cf3e x9 : 1d97c9a1b4ddef37
> x8 : 7541b65edebf928c x7 : e71937c4fc595de0 x6 : b8a0e09562430d1c
> x5 : ffff8000101e5401 x4 : ffff8000101cd401 x3 : ffff8000101e5380
> x2 : fffffffffffffff1 x1 : ffff8000101cd3c0 x0 : ffff8000101e5000
> Call trace:
> __memcpy+0x168/0x230
> process_one_work+0x1ec/0x370
> worker_thread+0x44/0x478
> kthread+0x154/0x160
> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> Code: a984346c a9c4342c f1010042 54fffee8 (a97c3c8e)
> ---[ end trace 568c28c7b6336335 ]---
>
> Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@....com>
Reviewed-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> index 90d84d3bc868..c7e45633beaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> @@ -285,7 +285,17 @@ static int pci_epf_test_copy(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test)
> if (ret)
> dev_err(dev, "Data transfer failed\n");
> } else {
> - memcpy(dst_addr, src_addr, reg->size);
> + void *buf;
> +
> + buf = kzalloc(reg->size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!buf) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_map_addr;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy_fromio(buf, src_addr, reg->size);
> + memcpy_toio(dst_addr, buf, reg->size);
> + kfree(buf);
> }
> ktime_get_ts64(&end);
> pci_epf_test_print_rate("COPY", reg->size, &start, &end, use_dma);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists