[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YdOntksAAhc/oaU1@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 01:49:42 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Walt Drummond <walt@...mmond.us>
Cc: aacraid@...rosemi.com, anna.schumaker@...app.com, arnd@...db.de,
bsegall@...gle.com, bp@...en8.de, chuck.lever@...cle.com,
bristot@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com, dinguyen@...nel.org,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hpa@...or.com,
idryomov@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com, yzaikin@...gle.com,
ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
bfields@...ldses.org, jlayton@...nel.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
john.johansen@...onical.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
keescook@...omium.org, mcgrof@...nel.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, mattst88@...il.com, mgorman@...e.de,
oleg@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
rth@...ddle.net, richard@....at, serge@...lyn.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
trond.myklebust@...merspace.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] signals: Support more than 64 signals
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 01:16:17AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 05:00:58PM -0800, Walt Drummond wrote:
> > I simply wanted SIGINFO and VSTATUS, and that necessitated this.
>
> Elaborate, please. What exactly requires more than 32 rt signals?
More to the point, which system had SIGINFO >= SIGRTMIN? Or signals
with numbers greater than SIGRTMAX, for that matter?
I really don't get it...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists